Report outlines steps needed to reduce child deaths from serious illness
Placing parents with children suspected of having illnesses such as meningitis nearer to the centre of decision-making, simplifying health services, and ensuring children see the same health professionals will help accelerate treatment and reduce deaths.
This is according to research published by the University of Northampton (UON), University of Plymouth and partner organisations*.
The Before Arrival at Hospital (BeArH) project looked at the pre-hospital journeys of children later diagnosed with a serious infectious illness such as meningitis and sepsis.
Researchers spoke with 40 parents and 30 health professionals, including hearing about the concerns raised by mothers whose children died from serious infectious illnesses such as sepsis after failures in the health system.
Infections such as these continue to be a major cause of childhood deaths in the UK, particularly in the first 5 years of life. The most recent analysis of child mortality data (from 2013-15) in England and Wales found that infection was associated with 20% of all childhood deaths.**
In the East Midlands alone 28,929 children (27.9% of all admissions) were admitted with infectious illness between 2011-2014.
Researchers worked with parents and health professionals to understand what happens to children later diagnosed with a serious infectious illness, before they are admitted to hospital. They asked about every point on the child’s illness journey from falling ill at home, through all the contacts with health services up until they were admitted to hospital.
The research aimed to identify points in this journey where improvements could be made, to ensure timely treatment and, ultimately, save lives. The findings include:
- Parents feel powerlessness and a loss of control over their child’s health and their access to treatment.
- Parents often report feeling criticised for using services in the early stages of the illness. This can lead to delay in seeking help again.
- Parents and health professionals both miss signs and markers of serious illness.
- The health system can be complex for both professionals and parents.
- There is a lack of continuity of the health professionals caring for individual children – few see the same professional when seeking help again.
- Risk averse agencies refer more suspected cases to hospitals, adding extra stress in the system. One emergency doctor quoted in the report commented: “We have made the haystack bigger. There is still only one needle, but the haystack is enormous.”
The report outlines the need for further research into parents’ consultations with health professionals to identify causes of perceived criticism.
It also suggests a feasibility study for a safety-netting app, reducing the complexity of services and improving the continuity of health professionals involved in the care of each child with a serious infectious illness.
Tash Bayes, Research Assistant at UON was BeArH’s project manager. She said: “We are very happy to share the important findings of the BeArH project, the implications for young children and their families and to outline our next steps.
“BeArH has been a multifaceted, multi-site project in collaboration with academics, health professionals, parents and charity organisations over three years. Their perspectives throughout the research were crucial; without them, conducting and completing BeArH would not have been possible.”
Former UON Associate Professor Dr Sarah Neill – now a Professor based at BeArH partner, the University of Plymouth – is chief investigator of the BeArH project. She adds: “During our research, we heard heart-breaking accounts from parents. I’d firstly like to express my thanks to them for their time and courage in sharing their stories, and to the health professionals for lending us their valuable insights.
“The findings from the BeArH research provide important insights into the complex interplay of factors that influence the timing of treatment for these serious infectious illnesses.
“Parents, already distressed when their child is unwell, feel disempowered in the face of the established knowledge of health professionals in an overstretched service. For both, that system can be a complicated terrain to navigate.
“This can lead to a ‘perfect storm’ with tragic outcomes, ironically in a system designed to stop this. We hope that the BeArH findings and follow-up investigations will help to reduce child deaths.”
Kerry Fisher, from Staffordshire, was one of the parents who informed the report after losing her daughter, Rubie, to Meningitis at six weeks old. Thinking her smaller feeds and general ‘under the weather’ symptoms were a cold, and the GP agreeing, Rubie refused a feed at 10.30pm one Thursday night, and passed away less than 12 hours later. Kerry said: “I knew something was wrong when she hadn’t woken for her bottle by 4am and she was almost grunting with her breathing. We went to A&E and at 9am we’d lost her. I can’t believe how quickly it all happened.
“The consultant stayed with us and told us it was Meningitis, and six weeks later, we found out that it was bacterial Meningitis caused by late onset group B strep. I remember the consultant telling us that, as very young children can’t talk, trying to identify a problem is like having knots in a long piece of string and having to untie each one individually to rule it out.
“Sharing our story and informing the BeArH report is not about blaming anyone. I know how hard health professionals train, and I feel that I myself did everything I could to help my little girl. It’s about sharing the situation to stop it happening to anyone else, and, for us, keeping Rubie’s memory alive in the process.”
Read more recollections from parents: 16092021 BeArH report personal accounts.
Notes to editors
*The BeArH research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research. The full list of partner organisations is:
- Edge Hill University
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Meningitis Now
- Mother’s Instinct Support Group
- Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (NHFT)
- University of Leicester
- University of Leicester Hospitals NHS Trust
- University of Liverpool
- University of Northampton
- University of Plymouth
- Meningitis Research Foundation
- UK Sepsis Trust
- Encephalitis UK
**Ferreras-Antolín, Oligbu et al. 2020.
The BeArH project presents independent research funded by the NIHR under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0416-20011). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
The mission of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research. They do this by:
- Funding high quality, timely research that benefits the NHS, public health and social care.
- Investing in world-class expertise, facilities and a skilled delivery workforce to translate discoveries into improved treatments and services.
- Partnering with patients, service users, carers and communities, improving the relevance, quality and impact of our research.
- Attracting, training and supporting the best researchers to tackle complex health and social care challenges.
- Collaborating with other public funders, charities and industry to help shape a cohesive and globally competitive research system.
- Funding applied global health research and training to meet the needs of the poorest people in low and middle income countries.
- NIHR is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. Its work in low and middle income countries is principally funded through UK Aid from the UK government.