Transparency review
Introduction
The Transparency Review is a Government initiative, introduced in the Government's first Comprehensive Spending Review in 1998. The Comprehensive Spending Review awarded £1.5bn of additional funding for higher education on the condition that the sector becomes more open about the way in which public funds are spent in universities and colleges.
As a result of this the Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) methodology has been developed for the higher education sector. Every university and college had to implement new costing methods that will satisfy the standards in the Transparency Review Report by reporting transparently on the costs of their teaching, research and other activities.
Transparent approach to costing (TRAC)
The University is required to collect data about the costs of 4 activities: Teaching (T), Research (R), Other activities (O) and Support (S). The costs of T and R are each to be split between publicly-funded (PF) and non publicly-funded (NPF) leading to five figures to be reported (PF T, NPF T, PF R, NPF R, O). An additional split of R between research sponsor categories is also required. Institutions report in January each year, based on the accounts for the previous financial year. Guidance notes to these classifications can be found under Detailed Definitions.
From January 2006, the Funding Councils require that the annual reporting at an institutional level will include income as well as costs. Institutions will, in effect, report their surplus and deficit position on each of the five activities listed in the previous paragraph.
The annual TRAC process can also be used to provide management information for internal use. It also provides the data (financial and non financial) used to calculate the indirect cost rate, the estates charges and charge-out rates for other directly allocated costs such as research facilities and technicians.
From 2005 all institutions are calculating the full economic costs of each research project, on a reliable and comprehensive basis. This is then used to set the price for grants made by Government (the Research Councils and Other Government Departments) and informs the price on projects for other sponsors. The full economic cost of a project is made up of directly incurred costs, directly allocated costs, and indirect costs. The latter two types of cost use the rates generated from the annual Transparency Review process).If you require any assistant please contact transparency@northampton.ac.uk and we will endeavour to respond to your enquiry










Follow us